May 13, 2005 Volume 1, Number 11   
 1. Women Leaving the
     GOP!
 2. Stay Tuned - Anti-
     Choice Bills Debated
     Today
 3. Emily's List Insider
     News
 4. Save Violence Against
     Women Act
 5. 1600 Penn Ave - Bush
     and His Women
 6. New Counter Terrorism
     Strategy = Feminism?
 7. Want to Do Something
     About It?

Collectively, we are a powerful force!

 

Only 542 Days until Election Day 2006!
So please forward this to every woman you know who should be part of the Missouri Women's Coalition and encourage them to join with us...

Women Leaving the GOP!
Yes, it's true - according to a new polling memo released several days ago by reknown woman pollster, Celinda Lake, women are getting fed up with George Bush and his Republican cohorts.

At a press conference, part of an event sponsored by WomensVote USA this week in Washington D.C. - Celinda Lake unveiled brand new polling data on the 25 year old Gender Voting Gap.

Women voters who just months ago supported Bush are moving back to the Democratic party by a 13 point margin. Citing health care and economic security as top issues, these women are showing greater support for Democratic candidates versus Republican candidates on the generic congressional ballot. Read more about it below.

The 2005 Session of the Missouri State Legislature Adjourns Today at 6pm
Our legislators have been going strong all week with many very late nights (while we were sleeping). Stay tuned for an update.

1. Women Leaving the GOP!

Women Returning to Democratic Party, Poll Finds
By Brian Faler, Washington Post , May 10, 2005

The gender gap is now 25 years old and, according to recent polling, it is alive and well.

A Democratic polling memo released yesterday found that women, who voted for President Bush last year in large numbers, have begun migrating back to their traditional home in the Democratic Party as the public's agenda has shifted from homeland security and terrorism to domestic concerns such as jobs and the economy.

There has long been a gender gap between the parties, with women tending to vote Democratic in disproportionate numbers. Bush all but closed that gap last year, losing the female vote to Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) by three percentage points. But the memo pointed to a March survey that found women favoring Democrats when asked which party's candidates they would support if congressional elections were held today.

The memo, released by Lake Snell Perry Mermin & Associates Inc., found women picked unnamed Democratic congressional candidates over Republicans by a 13-point margin. It also found that several key groups of women who voted Republican last year are now evenly or almost evenly split between the parties. Married women are now evenly split, while white women favor Democrats by three percentage points. Kerry lost both groups by 11 points.

"Homeland security and terrorism dominated the public's security agenda for several years following September 11th," the memo said. "However, the current focus appears to have shifted from safeguarding against terrorism to a stronger emphasis on issues that hit home financially. In dozens of recent focus groups among many different cohorts of women, concerns like retirement, health care and economic security are trumping the sorts of homeland security concerns that dominated women's issue agenda before the last election."

Some pollsters questioned the survey's methodology, objecting to its comparison between actual candidates' performances at the polls and the theoretical takes of unnamed candidates. Democratic pollster Celinda Lake, who issued the memo, defended the methodology, saying, "There's not really anything else we have."

Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway said that she could not comment on the specifics of the polls but that she agreed with the general thrust of Lake's findings. "Women, if left to their own devices, are going to tend and trend Democratic. That is absolutely the case," she said. "Women are still congenitally Democratic -- and I'm the Republican pollster saying that."

The memo, which comes on what experts said is the 25th anniversary of the discovery of the gender gap, found that women are now mostly concerned with economic security (28 percent said it was their number one issue), health care (22 percent), homeland security and terrorism (21 percent), retirement security (15 percent) and crime (6 percent).

"You can't target women three days out from the election," Lake said, referring to the 2006 elections. "Both sides are asking: 'Where are they now?' "

2. Stay Tuned - Anti-Choice Bills Debated Today

Update from Planned Parenthood Affiliates of Missouri and Kansas:

The Missouri Legislature spent most of Thursday debating how to increase government intrusion in our personal reproductive lives.

The House of Representatives passed an amended version of SB 2 mid-day on Thursday. SB 2 has been changed several times from the original version. The bill that passed on Thursday includes:

  • Domestic Gag Rule-Prevents any provider of "health or social services programs" from receiving state funds if they provide pregnant women with all options information
  • Tax Credits for Crisis Pregnancy Centers
  • Burdensome Clinic Regulations
  • Civil liability against any adult aiding or assisting a teen with a crisis pregnancy who cannot tell her parents. This bill penalizes any adult-a grandmother, aunt or minister-who helps the teen obtain an abortion by exposing them to unlimited fees.
  • Replaces the requirement to teach medically accurate info on contraception with a requirement to "inform students that medically and personally relevant information regarding contraception, abortion and pregnancy may be available from their previously designate family practitioner." We believe that the school would need to have prior permission from a parent in order to do this.

Pro-choice legislators were NOT recognized to offer any amendments, not even a family planning amendment. SB 2 then went back to the Senate where debate started Thursday afternoon.

Meanwhile, debate on HB 100 started in the Senate at 10:00 AM. Our pro-choice legislators have been hard at work trying to defeat anti-choice amendments, while at the same time offering amendments that actually reduce unintended pregnancy.

HB 100 now includes:

  • Burdensome clinic regulations that will close reproductive health centers in Missouri
  • Respect Life License Plates
  • Alternatives to Abortion Fund

The Senate rejected the following amendments

  • Family Planning Program
  • Removal of the burdensome clinic regulations
  • Pro-Choice license plates

Both HB 100 and SB 2 can be taken up in the Senate at anytime (even in the wee hours of the morning). You can listen to the debates live over the internet. Go to www.senate.state.mo.us

Please take a moment to thank the pro-choice Senators that are fighting hard to protect reproductive rights.

Joan Bray bray@senate.mo.gov 573-751-2514
Maida Coleman maida_coleman@senate.mo.gov 573-751-2606
Yvonne Wilson Yvonne.Wilson@senate.mo.gov 573-751-9758
Charles Wheeler charles_wheeler@senate.mo.gov 573-751-2788
Rita Days ritadays@senate.mo.gov 573-751-4106
Chuck Graham chuck.graham@seante.mo.gov 573-751-4703

www.ppslr.org

3. Emily's List Insider News

Pelosi brings Democrats together to strategize on Social Security

In an effort to stave off President Bush's push to privatize Social Security, a plan that will disproportionately harm women, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) joined a group of strong Democratic women on Tuesday to draw attention to the effects privatization would have on women. The meeting marks the first event in a long-term plan to build opposition to private accounts.

"Fresh out of Mother's Day...we're ready for the fight," Pelosi said at the panel.

The Democratic representatives, nine women and one man, focused their discussion on families, children, and women in the workforce. EMILY's List women were well represented at the conference, including Rep. Corrine Brown (D-Fla.), Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones (D-Ohio), and Rep. Gwen Moore (D-Wisc.).

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.) also voiced her concerns about Bush's Social Security proposal last month during the "30-something hour," congressional time dedicated to discussion among the younger members of the U.S. House. Schultz, 38, drew attention to a new report by Social Security and Medicare trustees that predicts disastrous insolvency for Medicare years before the Social Security trust fund is forecast to run out. Attempting to refocus the debate and set national priorities straight, Schultz noted that the more immediate problem for America's seniors is Medicare.

Gregoire signs off on sweeping environmental protections
Washington Gov. Christine Gregoire signed seven bills designed to conserve environmental resources and develop alternative energy sources. Among the measures she approved Friday include raising Washington's car emissions standards to match those of California, currently the strongest in the nation. It is estimated that the new laws will lower emissions from cars and light trucks by 25 percent, and reduce emissions from SUVs and larger trucks by 18 percent.

These new emissions standards will go into effect in 2009; by 2016, all new cars, SUVs, and light trucks registered in Washington state will be required to meet the heightened standards.

Gregoire, former director of Washington's Department of Ecology, called the measure "one of the single most important pieces of environmental legislation we've had in a long time." She noted in particular the health benefits these new standards will offer to children and the elderly.

Currently in Washington state, cars and trucks produce 80 percent of all air toxic emissions, and U.S. automobile companies lag behind foreign manufacturers in creating environmentally friendly and innovative technologies. This measure will compel U.S. automakers to catch up to reach consumers in Washington state - and set an example for other states to follow.

Anti-choice legislators fail to override Sebelius's veto of abortion bill
Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius's veto of a bill that would impose unusually stringent regulations on abortion clinics was upheld after anti-choice legislators failed to round up enough votes for an override. The House fell two votes short of overriding Sebelius's veto April 28th, which means the bill will not go to the Senate, where anti-choice forces had higher hopes of success.

Sebelius spoke out against the legislature's efforts to override her veto, saying anti-choice Republicans elevated partisan politics above "good policy." According to Sebelius, medical professionals - not lawmakers - should set standards for abortion clinics.

Washington seeks Schwartz's state Senate seat
Pennsylvania State Rep. LeAnna Washington's campaign for state Senate will come to an end next Tuesday, when residents of the fourth district vote to fill the seat left vacant by U.S. Rep. Allyson Schwartz.

Washington, a Philadelphia resident and 12-year veteran of the state House, faces Republican Ron Holt, who mounted an unsuccessful challenge to Schwartz in 2002, receiving 15,231 votes out of the 85,910 cast. Washington has a strong base; the fourth Senate district completely encompasses Washington's House district.

Victory for Washington on May 17 would bring the number of Democratic women in the Pennsylvania Senate to five.

www.emilyslist.org

4. Save Violence Against Women Act

From Wellstone Action - Don't Let the VAWA Expire!

For more than 10 years, Paul and Sheila Wellstone were a team in the fight to end violence against women. Working in Washington and in local communities with advocates and survivors, they became national leaders on this issue. As a direct result of their efforts, in 1994 Congress passed and President Clinton signed into law the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA).

VAWA was landmark legislation that demonstrated the federal government's commitment to ending violence against women and children. It ensures that victims no longer suffer in silence and that survivors have the services they need in their community. VAWA is a community based approach to ending violence and provides legal assistance, shelters, rape crisis services and improved law enforcement efforts.

VAWA expires on September 30, 2005.

The Violence Against Women Act, and all of its provisions - including critical funding to community violence prevention programs - expires in a few short months. The Sheila Wellstone Institute is leading a national grassroots campaign to save VAWA by reauthorizing this vital legislation. Check out the new section of our website dedicated to this campaign - the VAWA Online Action Center.

We are expecting that VAWA legislation will be proposed in both houses of Congress in the coming weeks. If we don't see a bill by mid-June, we'll need your help to ask Congress "Where's VAWA"?

The mission at Wellstone Action and the Sheila Wellstone Institute is to carry on Paul and Sheila's work and to continue their advocacy for programs that helps improve people's lives. The Violence Against Women Act exemplifies Paul and Sheila's commitment to making government work for people. We hope that you will join us in the coming months as we organize to save VAWA.

Wellstone Action
www.wellstone.org

5. 1600 Penn Ave: Bush and His Women
by Alexis Simendinger of the National Journal

President Bush is a scenery-chewing, tyranny-taunting, third-rail-hugging chief executive who won a second term in part by flaunting his testosterone. Men tell pollsters that they like Bush, and in 2004, the president was happy to find that married women flocked to his Lone Star leadership style.

But in a jam -- which is pretty much how the second term is starting out -- the president senses some gender slippage and is not averse to employing the women in his life. He's not a girlie man, clearly, but a man who knows how to use the girls. Just six months ago, Bush turned to security and leadership themes to win 48 percent of the women's vote, besting his performance in 2000 by 5 points.

Against the backdrop of a deadly Iraq, Washington's intervention in the Terri Schiavo case, an iffy Social Security campaign, and the wallet-tightening climb of a gallon of gas and a gallon of milk to the same $2.50 price level, the president is losing support among women. On every issue, the Gallup Organization found in an April 30 to May 1 survey, women are more disapproving of Bush's performance in office than are men.

Fifty-four percent of women frown on Bush's overall performance, while 53 percent of men applaud him. Women, who now have a generally more pessimistic outlook about the economy than men, disapprove of Bush's handling of the economy by 59 percent; men are split at 48 percent approval and 48 percent disapproval. Both men and women give Bush low marks for his handling of gas prices, but women are more critical: 73 percent of women disapprove of how he has handled prices at the pump, compared with 60 percent of men.

On Bush's handling of foreign affairs, 54 percent of women are unimpressed, while men favor Bush by 52 percent. Thinking specifically about his handling of Iraq, 63 percent of women give the president low marks, while a majority of men -- 51 percent -- say they approve of Bush's handling of Iraq.

After barnstorming the country trying to create support for his Social Security ideas, the president has found only minority backing among both genders, but the disapproval among women is more acute: 65 percent, compared with 50 percent disapproval among men, according to Gallup. (A month after his re-election, half of women thought that Bush's Social Security personal investment accounts were a good idea, but by February, that support had plummeted by 8 points, according to the Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. And among women over 50, the drop-off of support was a more dramatic 11 points, Pew found.)

So, it's entirely understandable that the leader of the free world last Saturday night ceded his microphone at the White House Correspondents' Association Dinner to Laura Bush, the most popular figure on his team. With an angelic smile and a flick of her chiffon-bedecked arm to direct her husband to return to his seat, the first lady commiserated with married women everywhere about her "George." He's asleep while the night is young; he abandons her to the tube; he's overly fond of power tools; he was more Oliver Wendell Douglas (of Green Acres fame) than John Wayne as an outdoorsman; and his mother is a forbidding meddler. It's not just that women laughed and could relate to Laura; they could warm to the foibles of her spouse.

And speaking of his mother, Barbara Bush has been part of the president's vaudeville act for years. Women enjoy hearing the president's yarns about the Bush family matriarch, who brings the powerful to heel. So when the president was in the Sunshine State in March, struggling to persuade seniors that he is not trying to snatch away their monthly Social Security checks, he trotted out his dear old ma to make the sale. "If you would listen, I'd tell you more," Barbara admonished her tongue-tied son as she backed his efforts.

On the foreign-affairs front, Bush relies on battle-hardened women as his scouts. In February, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, one of the president's closest confidants, donned stiletto boots and a black, slit-up-to-there brass-buttoned coat in Germany to send the message that Bush would wow the leaders of "old Europe" with kisses on both cheeks.

As Rice seeks to soothe foreign leaders fed up with American bullying, the president tasked his former counselor, Karen Hughes, to improve America's image. Bush's thinking is that since Hughes, who is working from a State Department post, managed his communications in Texas, guided him through 2000's rugged election -- and through the tumult of 9/11 and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq -- she's the gal who can sell the Stars and Stripes in hostile parts of the globe.

When it comes to female rescuers, the president is even brazen enough to wield his fluffy new puppy, Miss Beazley, as a shield. The morning after his East Room news conference last week, a reporter asked about Social Security during a North Lawn tree-planting event that included the presidential canines. Ignoring his interrogators, Bush trained all of his attention on his petite Scottish terrier. "C'mon, Beaz," he said twice as the cameras clicked.

6. New Counter Terrorism Strategy = Feminism?
By Barbara Ehrenreich, May 10, 2005

A sustained and serious effort to gain human rights for women worldwide could be the start of a brand new approach to fighting terrorism.

I've been reading Bin Ladin - Carmen, that is, not her brother-in-law Osama (she spells the last name with an "i") - and I'd like to present a brand-new approach to terrorism, one that turns out to be more consistent with traditional American values. First, let's stop calling the enemy "terrorism," which is like saying we're fighting "bombings." Terrorism is only a method; the enemy is an extremist Islamic insurgency whose appeal lies in its claim to represent the Muslim masses against a bullying superpower.

But as Carmen Bin Ladin urgently reminds us in her book Inside the Kingdom, one glaring moral flaw of this insurgency, quite apart from its methods, is that it aims to push one-half of those masses down to a status only slightly above that of domestic animals. While Osama was getting pumped up for jihad, Carmen was getting up her nerve to walk across the street in a residential neighborhood in Jeddah - fully-veiled but unescorted by a male, something that is an illegal act for a woman in Saudi Arabia. Eventually she left the kingdom and got a divorce because she didn't want her daughters to grow up in a place where women are kept "locked in and breeding."

So here in one word is my new counterterrorism strategy: feminism. Or, if that's too incendiary, try the phrase "human rights for women." I don't mean just a few opportunistic references to women, like those that accompanied the war on the Taliban and were quietly dropped by the Bush administration when that war was abandoned and Afghan women were locked back into their burqas. I'm talking about a sustained and serious effort.

We should announce plans to pour U.S. tax dollars into girls' education in places like Pakistan, where the high-end estimate for female literacy is 26 percent, and into scholarships for women seeking higher education in nations that typically discourage it. (Secular education for the boys wouldn't hurt, either.) Expand the grounds for asylum to all women fleeing gender totalitarianism, wherever it springs up. Reverse the Bush policies on global family planning, which condemn seventy-eight thousand women to death each year in makeshift abortions. Lead the global battle against the trafficking of women. I'm not expecting such measures alone to incite a feminist insurgency within the Islamist one. Carmen Bin Ladin found her rich Saudi sisters-in-law sunk in bovine passivity, and some of the more spirited young women in the Muslim world have been adopting the head scarf as a gesture of defiance toward American imperialism. We're going to need a thorough foreign policy makeover - from Afghanistan to Israel - before we have the credibility to stand up for anyone's human rights. You can't play the gender card with dirty hands.

If this country were to embrace a feminist strategy against the insurgency, we'd have to start by addressing our own dismal record on women's rights. We'd be pushing for the immediate ratification of the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, which has been ratified by 169 countries but remains stalled in the U.S. Senate. We'd be threatening to break off relations with Saudi Arabia until it acknowledged the humanity of women. And we'd be thundering about the shortage of women in the U.S. Senate and House, an internationally embarrassing 14 percent. We should be aiming for a representation of at least 25 percent, the same target the Transitional Administrative Law of Iraq has set for the federal assembly there.

If we want to beat Osama, we've got to start by listening to Carmen.

Editor's Note: This is an excerpt from Stop the Next War Now: Effective Responses to Violence and Terrorism (Inner Ocean), edited by Code Pink co-founders Medea Benjamin and Jodie Evans.

www.AlterNet.org

7. Want to Do Something About It?

Jefferson Township Dem Club Takes Back Their Community

On Sunday afternoon, May 15, the Jefferson Township Democratic Club will continue organizing Jefferson Township (Webster Groves/Glendale). Wear good walking shoes and;

Meet at Glendale City Hall, 424 N Sappington Rd. at 1pm. (Click here to see map.)

We'll be canvassing the unknown or undecided - not the known Democrats or Republicans. It's easy, it's fun, a nice walk and there's no hard sell;

The idea is to gather activists from the entire township and beyond to canvass one area, then another area, and another area. We want to be engaged with every Democrat in Jefferson Township and beyond and not just at election time;

RSVP to Jeanne Kirkton - jkirkton@earthlink.net

Know of Someone who would Love This Newsletter?

Feel free to forward this newsletter and encourage them to join the Missouri Women's Coalition - www.missouriwomenscoalition.com - to continue receiving their own!

“News We Can Use” is a weekly publication of the Missouri Women’s Coalition
6340 Clayton Rd #206    St.Louis MO 63117    USA
www.missouriwomenscoalition.com

Copyright © 2004 Missouri Women's Coalition. All rights reserved.
Missouri Women’s Coalition is a political action committee registered with the Missouri Ethics Commission.
We are not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
Contributions or gifts to the Missouri Women’s Coalition are not tax deductible.

Site designed and maintained by
Andrew Newman