July 15th, 2005 Volume 1, Number 18   
 1. St. Louis North County
     Accountability Meeting
 2. Congrats to 2nd
     Congressional Dem
     Women – Great
     Summit!
 3. Laura Bush Said
     What??
 4. Poll: Most Americans
     Want a Woman to
     Replace O’Connor;
     Favor Roe
 5. Iowa Unfriendly to
     Political Women
 6. Women Hurt by Health
     Costs, Fear Breast
     Cancer: Studies

Collectively, we are a powerful force!

 

Only 479 Days until Election Day 2006!
So please forward this to every woman you know who should be part of the Missouri Women's Coalition and encourage them to join with us...

WOMEN LAWYERS RUN FOR JUDICIAL COMMISSION ELECTIONS
We are excited to announce three outstanding St. Louis area attorneys (and Missouri Women’s Coalition members) will be on the ballot for judicial commission elections to be held this fall.

The judicial commissions are responsible for selecting judicial nominees for appointment by the governor. Ballots will go out in October to approximately 9500 attorneys who will elect one new member to each commission for a six year term.

For the first time ever, an all women slate is endorsed by the Women’s Lawyers’ Association of St. Louis: Nancy Mogab, Mary Anne Sedey and Debbie Champion, each accomplished in their legal fields and the women’s community. They share in the commitment to protect the Missouri Non-partisan Court Plan and enhance the quality and diversity of the judiciary. Each of these women knows what makes a good judge.

Click here for more info about the candidates and contact information.

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Women are sorely lacking as a presence on each commission and in the courts: the Eastern District Appellate Court (currently 5 women judges out of 14), St. Louis City (currently 13 women judges out of 37) and the St. Louis County Circuit Courts (currently 15 women judges out of 39).

HOW CAN YOU HELP?

This is a campaign just like general elections:

  1. Talk to every pro-woman lawyer that you know and encourage them to support these candidates. Only lawyers living in these districts are eligible to cast a ballot.
  2. Donate to their campaigns – see link above.
  3. Volunteer to help with mailings and phoning – contact us at snewman@missouriwomenscoalition.com if you can help.

Please join us as we lend campaign support to three marvelous women who are campaigning in additional to their regular hectic work and family schedules.

WHEN WOMEN RUN, WOMEN WILL WIN!

1. St. Louis North County Accountability Meeting

DID YOU KNOW THAT GOV. BLUNT IS CALLING A TAX WASTING, SPECIAL SESSION JUST TO RESTRICT ACCESS TO FAMILY PLANNING AND ABORTION SERVICES?

DO YOU KNOW WHERE YOUR LEGISLATORS STAND ON THE ISSUES OF FAMILY PLANNING, SEX EDUCATION AND ABORTION ACCESS?

Find out at the North County Community Reproductive Health Meeting:
Saturday July 30 11am to 1pm
Florissant Valley Community College, Student Center

Invited Legislators: Sen. Rita Days, Sen. Tim Green, Rep. John Bowman, Rep. Michael Corcoran, Rep. Bruce Darrough, Rep. Esther Haywood, Rep. Ted Hoskins, Rep. Michael Spreng, Rep. Gina Walsh, Rep Juanita Head Walton, and Rep. Clint Zweifel.

Sponsored By: American Association of University Women-Ferguson/Florissant Chapter; Missouri Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice; Missouri Women’s Coalition; NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri; National Organization of Women – St. Louis Chapter; Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region; and the St. Louis Women’s Political Caucus.

RSVP to Michele at 314.531.7526, ext 331 or michelle.trupiano@ppslr.org.

2. Congrats to 2nd Congressional Democratic Women – Great Summit!

We applaud the 2nd Congressional Democratic Women who sponsored a fabulous Democratic Summit last week for local committed Democrats. Stacey Newman, director of the Missouri Women’s Coalition, was proud to participate as a moderator for several break out sessions.

Over 100 activists and state legislators from six regions of the St. Charles and St. Louis area brainstormed on topics such as local grassroots activity, fundraising, and candidate recruitment.

Stay tuned for information on followup summits. These ladies are just getting started…

3. Laura Bush Said What??

Laura Bush Wants a Woman to Fill the Supreme Court Vacancy

In an interview on NBC's "Today Show," Laura Bush said that she hoped a woman would fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the retirement of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor. “I would really like him (President Bush) to name another woman,” she said, according to the Washington Post.

LAURA BUSH: Sure, I would really like for him to name another woman. And I admire and respect Sandra Day O'Connor so much. She's been a friend that I've loved seeing whenever I had the chance when I'm in Washington.

But I know that my husband will pick somebody who has a lot of integrity and strength. And whether it's a woman or a man, of course, I have no idea.

But I'm proud that Sandra Day O'Connor was the first woman on the Supreme Court.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/07/12/AR2005071200699.html

4. Poll: Most Americans Want a Woman to Replace O'Connor; Favor Roe

A new CNN/USA Today/Gallup poll released today found that three out of four Americans want President Bush to name a woman to replace Sandra Day O'Connor on the Supreme Court. The poll also found that 68 percent of Americans don’t want Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 case legalizing abortion, overturned.

"The American people, and particularly American women, don't want a nominee who will roll back women's rights gains over the last 30 years,” said Eleanor Smeal, president of the Feminist Majority. “In 1981, I testified on behalf of Justice O'Connor because I knew then that O’Connor, although a conservative voice, would not permit the elimination of women’s fundamental rights, including the right to privacy."

"We are urging President Bush to appoint a woman who will not reverse women's rights to take O'Connor's place," said Smeal. "We cannot go back to just one woman on the highest court in the nation. The era of tokenism is over."

The poll also showed that almost two-thirds of those surveyed believed that Bush was likely to nominate someone who would be inappropriately influenced by his or her religious beliefs, according to USA Today.

http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=9158

5. Iowa Unfriendly to Political Women

Iowa Unfriendly for Women Pursuing Politics
By MIKE GLOVER, AP

DES MOINES, Iowa (July 12) - Iowa, a hotbed for politics, is unfriendly terrain for female candidates. The state that holds the nation's first presidential caucus stands as one of just two - Mississippi is the other - never to have elected a woman governor or sent a woman to Congress.

It's a statistic that puzzles political observers - and one that Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., considered a front-runner for her party's nomination in 2008, or any woman seeking the presidency can't ignore.

"I have no answers," said Des Moines lawyer Roxanne Conlin, who ran unsuccessfully for governor in 1982. "It's certainly distressing and embarrassing - quite embarrassing."

Iowa's record on female candidates has never been tested by presidential politics. Although they campaigned in the state, Colorado Rep. Pat Schroeder in 1988, Elizabeth Dole in 2000 and Carol Moseley Braun in 2004 quit before Iowans caucused in the opening nominating contests of their campaigns.

Since 1920, when women gained the right to vote, only 11 women have won statewide election in Iowa. All told, 21 states have elected women as governors, and eight states have a woman in the statehouse today.

"It's very weird because Iowa is a state with so many amazing women," said Debbie Walsh, who runs the Center for American Women and Politics at Rutgers University's Eagleton Institute.

Among the possible explanations is Iowa's predominantly senior population and their deeply held views on the role of women as well as the tendency for urban areas to elect more women than rural states.

Iowa ranks fourth in the nation in the percentage of its population 65 and older and is heavily rural. The city of Des Moines is the state's largest, with close to 200,000 residents.

Dianne Bystrom, director of the Carrie Chapman Catt Center for the Study of Women in Politics at Iowa State University, said surveys "show that older women tend to be less supportive of other women than younger women."

Some analysts point to the state's farming history, where women and men have performed gender-specific tasks - men tilling the fields, women at the homestead tending to their poultry, gardens and canning.

"That is a deeply ingrained societal view of the culture and the view of women," said Bonnie Campbell, the Democratic gubernatorial nominee in 1994.

When she tracked her polling as that election played out, Campbell found that Iowans just couldn't see her or another woman as their state's leader.

"I was either ahead or even right up until mid-September or maybe October. Our polling began to show that people liked me, thought I was smart enough, didn't disagree with me on a lot of issues, but when the pollster asked the question, 'Who do you think would be better qualified to lead Iowa?' it just fell off," she said.

That attitude was also evident to Ann Hutchinson, the former Bettendorf mayor who unsuccessfully challenged Rep. Jim Nussle, R-Iowa, in the last election.

"There are barriers in attitudes, particularly among women," Hutchinson said. "Why is it that women don't want other women to succeed?"

Iowa women have had only limited political success. Joy Corning served two terms as lieutenant governor, but her bid for the Republican gubernatorial nomination never took off and she dropped out of the race.

"I had never felt I was discriminated against because I was a woman. But, you know, there may have been some subtle things that I missed," Corning said. "I don't know the answer."

Others cited the strong tendency among Iowans to retain politicians, especially if there have never been any major missteps.

"One of the things that's been different about the circumstances in Iowa is we've been prone to re-elect our incumbents," said Lt. Gov. Sally Pederson, who also heads the Iowa Democratic Party.

The last sitting governor to be defeated was in 1962. The last sitting U.S. House member to lose an election was in 1974.

There's considerable frustration among activists. Campbell noted that Florida has an older population yet little hesitation sending women to Congress. Nebraska and Kansas are rural, too, but have had female governors.

"There have been women elected in far more conservative states than Iowa," Campbell said. "It is a bit of a perplexing question."

"It may be the candidates," Conlin said. "It may be the right woman has not come along."

Conlin stubbornly holds out hope, but she says she isn't running again.

"It's hard for me because I love Iowa. I love Iowans. I love everything about them - for the most part," she said. "In some ways we are progressive, but we are also a very traditional state."

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/wire/sns-ap-women-need-not-apply,1,716692.story?coll=sns-ap-nation-headlines

6. Women Hurt by Health Costs, Fear Breast Cancer: Studies

By Kristen Gerencher
Market Watch - Sunday 10 July 2005

San Francisco - Despite making many of the household health-care decisions and using medical services more often than men, more than one in four U.S. women are delaying care they think they need because of costs, according to a new study.

"The issue of costs is one that cuts across all insurance groups of women, both privately insured and uninsured women," said Alina Salganicoff, vice president and director of women's health policy at the Kaiser Family Foundation, which recently surveyed more than 2,700 women on health questions.

The overall portion of women delaying care due to costs rose to 27% in 2004 from 24% in 2001. The portion of working-age women without health insurance who delayed or chose not to get needed care ballooned to 67% from 59% in 2001, the study said.

Working-age women with private coverage weren't home free either: 17% of them put off care because they couldn't afford it, up from 13% four years ago. And 20% of women didn't fill a prescription for similar reasons versus 14% for men.

Screening rates for cancer-prevention techniques such as mammograms and pap smears slipped slightly, with 69% of women age 40 to 64 receiving mammograms last year compared with 73% in 2001. The rate for pap smears, which can catch early cervical cancer, dropped to 76% of women 18 to 64 from 81%.

Those declines may be difficult to interpret, Salganicoff said, because of disagreement within the medical community over the value of mammograms and new guidance about weighing individual risk for determining a patient's timetable for pap smears.

But the overall trend suggests cost-shifting is making women more reticent to get care they may need, she said.

"We don't really have any good options on the table to control health-care costs," Salganicoff said. "What we've been doing in the past decade is putting costs onto the health-care consumer in terms of premium costs, higher deductibles, higher copays."

Women also are more likely than men to be working part time or in jobs without benefits, and they tend to be covered as a dependent on a health plan more frequently, she said. "Should they become widowed or divorced, they're much more vulnerable to losing their coverage."

Health Promotion Lacking

Chronic conditions and mental-health care are also a concern. More women than men - 38% to 30% - have a chronic condition such as diabetes, asthma or high blood pressure that requires ongoing medical management, according to the study.

At 23%, women were diagnosed with anxiety or depression at twice the rate of men. But few had discussed mental and behavioral health issues with a doctor in the last three years. Fewer than half talked about calcium intake and only one-third touched on smoking as a health issue, the survey said.

Sexual health topics also received little attention. Only 31% of women 18 to 44 said they had a conversation about HIV/AIDS, and just 14% said they discussed emergency contraception with a doctor in the last three years.

Such omissions may reflect patients' reluctance to discuss sensitive topics or doctors' limited role in a fragmented system, Salganicoff said.

"In the case of drug abuse or domestic violence, it may be dealing with issues outside the medical arena but that still impact on women's health care," she said. "We don't have a situation where we pay doctors to provide this counseling service."

Even so, health-care providers are the preferred source of health information for 53% of women, with friends and family coming in a distant second at 16% and the Internet close behind at 15%.

Breast Cancer, Heart Disease Top Fears

Another survey suggests women's fear of heart disease is catching up to the risk they actually face from it.

When asked what disease they fear the most, breast cancer remains women's most dreaded diagnosis this year, according to a survey of more than 1,000 women from the Society for Women's Health Research.

But the female fear of heart disease has almost doubled since 2002 to 9.7%, perhaps reflecting a growing awareness that heart disease kills 500,000 American women each year - 50,000 more women than men, the survey said. Heart disease, including heart attack, hypertension and related heart ailments but not stroke, strikes women on average 10 years later than men.

In fact, heart disease was the leading cause of death for women in 2002 at 28.6%, followed by cancer at 21.6%. Stroke was a distant third, causing 8% of female deaths, followed by chronic lower respiratory diseases and Alzheimer's disease.

Cancer in general remains women's biggest scare-inducing disease, said Sherry Marts, vice president for scientific affairs for the Society.

"With cancer, it's a fear not only of the disease but also of the treatment of the disease," Marts said. "It's unpleasant surgeries and losing your hair...."

"The fear of breast cancer hasn't changed despite the fact that there's been a fair amount of publicity that breast cancer has become increasingly survivable," she said. "If caught early enough, you're quite likely to survive."

Women's fear of HIV/AIDS dipped to 9.3% from 11.3% three years ago, even as women's AIDS cases increased 15% from 1999 to 2003 versus a 1% increase for men, the survey said.

Giving and Taking Care

Fear of Alzheimer's disease nearly doubled to 4.6% this year, the society's study said. That may be due to what women see upon becoming caregivers, a role they assume more often than men.

About 12% of women in the Kaiser study said they care for a sick or disabled relative, and that percentage is projected to rise as baby boomers age, Salganicoff said.

What's more, nearly three out of 10 female caregivers spent at least 40 hours a week providing care, she said. "That's a full-time job, and many of these women are already working. A lot of women have to stop working and they become low-income."

Ironically, making time to care for the caregiver's health may be the toughest job of all, Marts said. "Things like watching what you eat and getting a chance to exercise become a challenge when you work outside the home and possibly care for an elderly relative."

Still, women are well served to work even a small amount of physical activity into their schedules and to ask their doctors about appropriate medical screenings and smoking cessation programs if they still light up, she said.

http://www.investors.com/breakingnews.asp?journalid=28935543&brk=1

Know of Someone who would Love This Newsletter?

Feel free to forward this newsletter and encourage them to join the Missouri Women's Coalition - www.missouriwomenscoalition.com - to continue receiving their own!

“News We Can Use” is a weekly publication of the Missouri Women’s Coalition
6340 Clayton Rd #206    St.Louis MO 63117    USA
www.missouriwomenscoalition.com

Copyright © 2004 Missouri Women's Coalition. All rights reserved.
Missouri Women’s Coalition is a political action committee registered with the Missouri Ethics Commission.
We are not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
Contributions or gifts to the Missouri Women’s Coalition are not tax deductible.

Site designed and maintained by
Andrew Newman